Technology Sharing

한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina

CCD camera and COMS camera?

CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) cameras and CMOS (Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor) cameras are two common digital image sensor technologies used to capture and process images.

1. CCD Camera:
   CCD cameras use a photoelectric sensor called CCD to capture images. The CCD sensor is a chip composed of a series of charge-coupled devices. When light shines on the CCD chip, each pixel converts the light into an electric charge and transfers the charge row by row to the edge of the chip, where it is finally read and converted into a digital image.
   CCD cameras usually have higher image quality and sensitivity, respond better to light, and can capture richness of details and colors. They are widely used in some application fields such as astronomical photography, high-end professional photography and scientific research.

2. CMOS Camera:
   CMOS cameras use CMOS image sensors to capture images. CMOS sensors are chips composed of a series of image sensing units, each of which contains a photosensitive element and some circuits. When light shines on the CMOS chip, each pixel unit converts the light into an electric charge, which is amplified and converted into a digital image on the same chip.
   CMOS cameras have some advantages over CCD cameras, such as low power consumption, high integration, low cost, and support for high frame rate and video capture. CMOS cameras are widely used in consumer electronics, smart phones, camcorders, and webcams.

Although CCD and CMOS cameras differ in image sensor technology, they both have the ability to capture images and convert them into digital form.
[Imagine that you have two different eyes that you can use to see things.
When using a CCD camera eye, it acts like an inverted funnel, focusing light onto a concentrated area, which is then passed to a processor that produces a picture. This eye reacts quickly to light and can capture a lot of detail and color changes, but may require more energy.
When you use a CMOS camera eye, it works more like many tiny eyes, each of which captures light directly and produces an electrical signal. These tiny eyes pass the signal into a processor, which then produces a picture. This eye is slower to react to light, but they are more efficient in processing signals and saving energy. 】

Machine Vision Software

1. HALCON
   HALCON machine vision software: Developed by MVTec of Germany, it has a wide range of applications and a flexible architecture, suitable for the rapid development of machine vision, medical imaging and image analysis applications. It supports Windows, Linux and Mac OS X operating systems, and is recognized as the best performing Machine Vision software in the European and Japanese industries. MVTec HALCON is a comprehensive machine vision standard software with a globally available integrated development environment (HDevelop).

2. Mech-Vision
   Mech-Vision: Mech-Mind Robotics' high-performance AI+3D product has a graphical interface, allowing users to deploy advanced machine vision applications such as loading and unloading, palletizing, positioning and assembly, express delivery, defect detection, and online measurement without writing code. Mech-Vision has integrated the full-process deployment function of visual applications, built-in 3D vision, deep learning and other advanced algorithms, and can quickly implement complex and diverse practical needs.

3. OpenCV (Open Source Computer Vision Library): OpenCV is a widely used open source machine vision library that provides a large number of image processing and computer vision algorithms. It supports multiple programming languages, such as C++, Python, and Java, and has cross-platform performance and rich functions, including image processing, feature detection, object recognition, camera calibration, etc.

Difference between Halcon and OpenCV

Halcon and OpenCV are both widely used tool libraries in the field of computer vision, but they differ significantly in terms of development language, commercial nature, functions and application areas, learning curve and ease of use, performance, etc.

1. Development language: Halcon mainly uses C++ and Halcon language, while OpenCV mainly uses C++, but also provides interfaces for languages ​​such as Python and Java. This means that Halcon has its proprietary Halcon language, which is suitable for professional development in specific fields, while OpenCV is more open and supports multiple programming languages, suitable for a wider range of developers.
2. Commercial nature: Halcon is a commercial software that requires a license to use, while OpenCV is open source and can be used for free. This difference affects the user's cost of use and the quality of community support and resources.
3. Functions and application areas: Halcon focuses on machine vision and image processing, and provides a wealth of visual algorithms and tools suitable for industrial vision, medical imaging and other fields. OpenCV is an open source library widely used in computer vision, image processing and machine learning, covering a wider range of fields, including feature extraction, object detection, image processing, machine learning, etc.
4. Learning curve and ease of use: Since Halcon is a professional commercial software, it may require a certain learning curve to use, but it provides powerful and professional functions. The open source nature of OpenCV makes it easier to obtain and learn, and there is a lot of documentation and community support, which is suitable for a wide range of developers.
5. Performance: Halcon is generally more efficient in performance, especially for some specific machine vision tasks. OpenCV also has good performance, but in some cases it may lag behind tool libraries designed specifically for machine vision.

In general, choosing Halcon or OpenCV depends on project requirements, budget, development experience, and specific application scenarios. If the project has high requirements for performance and accuracy and has sufficient budget, Halcon may be a better choice. For open source projects, academic research, or scenarios that require broad community support, OpenCV may be more suitable.