2024-07-12
한어Русский языкEnglishFrançaisIndonesianSanskrit日本語DeutschPortuguêsΕλληνικάespañolItalianoSuomalainenLatina
The micro front-end framework is a technical solution that aims to split large front-end applications into multiple small, independent, and maintainable micro front-end applications. Each micro front-end application can be independently developed, tested, deployed, and run while maintaining overall collaboration and user experience. This architecture is similar to the microservice architecture, but focuses on the front-end field.
Common points:When the route is switched, you can load the code of the corresponding application and let it run in the container.
characteristic | qiankun | Unbounded | single-spa | iframe |
---|---|---|---|---|
Technology stack support | Technology stack independent, supports React, Vue, Angular, etc. | Based on WebComponent, supports multiple technology stacks | Technology stack independent, supports multiple front-end frameworks | The technology stack is irrelevant, but integration needs to consider compatibility |
Access method | Simple, access through JS API | Relatively simple, encapsulated through WebComponent | Complex, need to configure single-spa life cycle | Simple, embed via HTML tags |
Sandbox Isolation | Provide JS sandbox and style isolation | Use WebComponent for natural isolation | Developers need to implement sandbox isolation by themselves | iframe natural isolation |
Route Management | Supports routing status retention and configurable routing mapping | Support virtual routing and maintain routing status | As a top-level router, you need to manage sub-application routes yourself | Routing is managed by the application in the iframe |
Application Communication | Provides communication mechanism between parent-child applications and child-child applications | Provide component-based API to support communication | Developers need to implement the communication mechanism themselves | Communication can be done through postMessage or URL parameters |
Resource preloading | Support static resource preloading | Support static resource preloading | Support lazy loading of applications | Does not support preloading, load on demand |
Performance impact | Lower, optimized through sandboxing and lazy loading | Lower, but WebComponent may have performance overhead | Low, but depends on application optimization | Higher, iframe loading and rendering overhead is high |
Development Experience | Better, provides rich API and documentation | Better, component-based API is more intuitive | Generally, you need to handle many details yourself | Better, easy to integrate with existing applications |
Production availability | Proven and suitable for production environments | Suitable for production environments, but may have less community support | Applicable to production environment, developers need to improve it themselves | Suitable for production environments, but security and performance issues need to be handled with caution |
Adaptation cost | Higher, need to adapt routing, life cycle, etc. | Moderate, mainly adapted to WebComponent | Higher, requires in-depth understanding of single-spa architecture | Low, but pay attention to compatibility and performance issues |
The micro-frontend framework brings many advantages to the development of front-end applications, such as technology stack independence, independent development and deployment, incremental upgrades, etc. However, it also has certain disadvantages, such as high access difficulty and poor resource sharing capabilities. Therefore, when choosing whether to use a micro-frontend framework, it is necessary to make a comprehensive consideration based on the specific needs of the project and the technical capabilities of the team. At the same time, in actual applications, it is also necessary to pay attention to the selection, architecture design, code management and other aspects of the micro-frontend framework to ensure the smooth progress of the project and the stable operation of the system.